发布网友 发布时间:2023-07-19 14:04
共5个回答
热心网友 时间:2024-12-04 09:04
根据你提供的关键词“inter-laboratory comparison”,我搜索了相关的资料 -- 因为我想要明确关键词是按照内行规矩来翻的。根据阅读下面几个页面的材料,特别是第一个链接,我的翻译如下。热心网友 时间:2024-12-04 09:04
So far, the only one because BFIC by ISO / IEC 17025 accredited calibration bodies flying, so there are only a flight check under the conditions of institutions to carry out inter-laboratory comparison of the time obviously premature. To this end, we also hope in the world to have more institutions to apply for a flight check and the adoption of ISO / IEC 17025, and through inter-laboratory comparison to better maintain the accuracy of the flight check, and further guarantee the quality of the flight check热心网友 时间:2024-12-04 09:04
So far, only a BFIC is e by ISO/IEC 17025 recognition of flight, therefore, calibration service only a flight calibration institutions under the conditions of the laboratory, the timing of the comparison system - obviously still not mature. Therefore, we also hope worldwide could have more flight calibration institutions and through ISO/IEC 17025 and comparison with laboratory system - better sustain calibration accuracy, flying to further ensure flight check quality. Home through ISO/IEC 17025 recognition of flight calibration machine.热心网友 时间:2024-12-04 09:05
At present up to, because BFIC is only one through the ISO/IEC 17025 approval flight verification organizations, therefore, flies under the verification organization condition in only then one, carries on inter-laboratory comparison the opportunity not to be obviously mature.Therefore, we also hoped can have the more flight verification organization application and through ISO/IEC in the worldwide scale 17025, and draws support from inter-laboratory comparison to maintain the flight verification well the accuracy, further guarantees the flight verification quality.热心网友 时间:2024-12-04 09:06
直接在百度上搜索,!免费翻译!!!立刻出来,自己搞安全点吧,!